Fear not! The Absolvitor is here …

Exciting news!  As part of a general revamp of their super website, Absolvitor has a new home on yell.com – although they do insist on calling me “The Absolvitor” … not sure why.

It does make me sound kind of like a really low-budget superhero.  Maybe one who come round after a crime had been committed (and solved by the police) to ensure that there was no civil liability incurred?

BTW, did you know that the term “Superhero” and its variants are registered as trademarks jointly by DC Comics and Marvel Comics since the 1960s (cf. U.S. Trademark Serial Nos. 72243225 and 73222079, inter alia).  No infringement is intended by the above references!

Posted in Blawgs, Intellectual Property, Yell.com Solicitors Blog | Tagged | Leave a comment

Tommy Sheridan, the story so far …

In case you haven’t been following the Sheridan case closely, here is a summary of the evidence so far…

Sundry Witness: “You are a liar.”

Sheridan: “No, you are.”

Sundry Witness: “No, you’re a liar for saying I’m a liar.”

Sheridan: “No, you’re a liar for saying I’m lying about your lying.”

Presumably, if Sheridan is acquitted, there will be a fresh round of prosecutions for perjury against all of the Crown witnesses? And if not, Mr. Sheridan can sue the jury for defamation of his character.

Posted in Criminal Law, Defamation, News | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Jazzing up the Judiciary

The latest web review for the Journal is now available online.  In the magazine it bears the title “Judges for the people” and is all about the new Judiciary of Scotland website.

An excerpt:

“The site includes pen portraits and photographs of the Senators of the College of Justice and sheriffs principal, which range from the brief and strictly business style to the more wide-ranging “see we’re only human too” style, which lists sporting, music and gastronomic interests alongside professional achievements. Did you know, for example, that the Sheriff Principal of Glasgow and Strathkelvin likes jazz?”

Posted in Court of Session, Journal Website Reviews, Scottish Court Service | Leave a comment

Law Centres Update 4

Mike Dailly, Principal Solicitor of Govan Law Centre and chair of the Law Society of Scotland‘s Access to Justice Committee, has called for the Scottish Legal Aid Board to be scrapped in a cost-cutting move which could save up to £40 Million a year. The proposal would see the creation of a new body from the ashes of SLAB and the Scottish Legal Complaints Commission, which would handle “all legal complaints, payments and strategic planning”.

Renfrewshire Law Centre are having a busy month as they launch their Law Wise clinic at the University of the West of Scotland. They are also looking for new members and (unpaid) directors.

The News & Star reports that Tony Brown, a former manager of Carlisle Law Centre (now Cumbria Law Centre) has been acquitted on charges of disorderly conduct during a visit to the town of then PM, Gordon Brown. He claimed that police were trying to stop him protesting. Tony Brown is said to be considering an action against the police for wrongful arrest.

Finally, the University of Bristol’s Human Rights Implementation Centre (HRIC), has been awarded two grants totalling nearly 2.4 Million Euros by the European Commission (EC). The funding will contribute towards research into torture prevention in Africa and the Commonwealth of Independent States.

Posted in Human Rights, Law Centres, News | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Sex, lies and pantomime

There may still be 80 days until Christmas, but it’s pantomime season already as the Tommy Sheridan perjury trial kicked off on Monday 4 October.

The Herald reported that the trial is likely to take at least two or three months – which is fine, because Lord Bracadale has nothing better to be doing with his time – and that the Legal Aid bill alone is likely to be in the region of half a million pounds!  Not to mention the costs of the prosecution and the court time and personnel to run this circus.  All of which is, I’m sure you’ll agree, a hugely sensible use of public money.

Given that the average Civil Legal Aid bill comes in at around £2,500, the Sheridan trial will cost the equivalent of 200 actual cases with meaningful outcomes that affect people’s lives.

Given that the perjury trial is, on one view, just the first stage in News International’s civil appeal against Mr. Sheridan’s defamation win, wouldn’t it be cheaper just to get the Scottish Legal Aid Board to pay the £200,000 damages directly to Tommy, and get him to appear in this year’s production of Snow White as a new eighth dwarf: “hairy”?

Posted in Criminal Law, Defamation, Glasgow, Legal Aid, News | Tagged , , , , | 3 Comments

Flying the flag for Scotland

Or, a lion rampant Gules armed and langued Azure within a double tressure flory counter-flory of the second.

So reads the heraldic description of the Royal Banner of the Royal Arms of Scotland.  Known to you and me as “The Lion Rampant”. It has been the banner of the Kings of Scotland for centuries.

Its earliest recorded use as a royal emblem in Scotland was by Alexander II in 1222, with the border added in the reign of Alexander III (1249–1286). The lion rampant maintained its place as the royal coat of arms of the Kingdom of Scotland until the Union of the Crowns in 1603, since when it has been part of the royal arms and royal banners of the United Kingdom.

As befits a Royal Standard, its use is heavily restricted. It may only be used by the following Great Officers (who officially represent The Sovereign):

  • Keeper of the Great Seal of Scotland (aka the First Minister);
  • Lord Lieutenants in their Lieutenancies;
  • Lord High Commissioner to the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland;
  • Lord Lyon King of Arms; and
  • other lieutenants (by special appointment).

Use by sports fans, other subjects and businesses is, in the words of the Lord Lyon “entirely wrong”. In fact, in terms of the Lyon King of Arms Act (1672 c.47) the unauthorised use of the lion rampant is an offence, punishable by a fine of £100 and forfeiture of the goods bearing the symbol.

And that whosoevir shall vse any other Armes any manner of way aftir the expireing of year and day from the date of the Proclamation to be issued herevpon in maner forsaid shall pay One Hundred pounds money toties quoties to the Lyon and shall likewayes escheat to his Maiestie all the moveable Goods and Geir vpon which the saids Armes are engraven or otherwise represented ..

It appears that such a fine can be levied daily while the offence continues, and that both Rangers FC and the Scottish National Party have been told off by the Lord Lyon for misuse of the lion rampant in the past.

Therefore, this blog post is illustrated with the Saltire, which is not subject to such restrictions.

Posted in Criminal Law, From the Archives, Scottish Government | Tagged , | 5 Comments

judges.com

As you may have noted, Scotland’s judiciary have launched a new website, and a very nice one it is too: Judiciary of Scotland.

One thing that I noticed was that it uses a .org.uk SLD (second level domain).  The Scottish Courts Service (still) uses a .gov.uk SLD.

According to their own website, “On 1 April 2010 The Judiciary and Courts (Scotland) Act 2008 established the Scottish Court Service as a new, independent statutory body. Previously the organisation was an Executive Agency of the Scottish Government accountable to the Scottish Ministers.”

At the time, I e-mailed asking whether, as a result, they would be switching to an alternative SLD.  This is the response I received:

Dear Mr Nisbet,

For clarification, the Scottish Judiciary are not part of Government. In fact a guarantee of judicial independence is given in the Judiciary and Courts (Scotland) Act 2008.

On 1 April the Governance arrangements for the Scottish Court Service changed. Instead of being a Government agency accountable to Scottish Ministers, the new Scottish Court Service is governed by a judicially-led Board, Chaired by the Lord President. However the Service remains part of the Scottish administration and therefore we are entitled to keep the domain name http://www.scotcourts.gov.uk.

Yours sincerely,

Susan Whiteford
Head of Corporate Communications
Scottish Court Service

Section 126(6) to (8) of the Scotland Act 1998 defines “Scottish Administration” as follows:

(6) References in this Act and in any other enactment to the Scottish Administration are to the office-holders in the Scottish Administration and the members of the staff of the Scottish Administration.

(7) For the purposes of this Act—

(a) references to office-holders in the Scottish Administration are to—

(i) members of the Scottish Executive and junior Scottish Ministers, and

(ii) the holders of offices in the Scottish Administration which are not ministerial offices, and

(b) references to members of the staff of the Scottish Administration are to the staff of the persons referred to in paragraph (a).

(8) For the purposes of this Act, the offices in the Scottish Administration which are not ministerial offices are—

(a) the Registrar General of Births, Deaths and Marriages for Scotland, the Keeper of the Registers of Scotland and the Keeper of the Records of Scotland, and

(b) any other office of a description specified in an Order in Council made by Her Majesty under this subsection.

And, Schedule 3 of the Judiciary and Courts (Scotland) Act 2008 specifies that: “The SCS is the holder of an office, which office is also to be known as the Scottish Court Service.”

The Scottish Administration (Offices) Order 1999, as amended, gives a further list of bodies in the same position.

According to Nominet UK (the .uk domain name registry in the UK), the .org.uk SLD is intended for use by “Not-for-profit entities”, whereas the .gov.uk SLD is restricted to use by “National, regional, and local government bodies and agencies”

So, while the Accountant in Court, Macer in the Court of Session and Macer in the High Court of Justiciary, Principal Clerk of Justiciary, Principal Clerk of Session and other Clerks or Officers of the Court of Session, the Sheriff Clerk and the Sheriff Clerk Depute are all part of the Scottish Administration, the Judges and Sheriffs – most definitively – are not.

They are a not-for-profit entity.

Posted in Court of Session, Scottish Court Service, Scottish Government | Tagged , | 3 Comments

The law of hearsay

As every student of Scots law knows, Section 2 of the Civil Evidence (Scotland) Act 1988 allows for the admissibility of hearsay evidence in civil cases: “evidence shall not be excluded solely on the ground that it is hearsay”.

According to the Scottish Law Commission, the position was as follows:

The rule against hearsay is, broadly speaking, to the effect that statements made other than by a witness giving evidence in court are not admissible. The rule extends both to verbal statements and to written statements …

REPORT ON CORROBORATION, HEARSAY AND RELATED MATTERS IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS (Scot. Law Com. No. 100; 1986)

However, I prefer the illustration given in Gilbert & Sullivan‘s Iolanthe, in the following exchange between Arcadian shepherd Strephan, and the (highly susceptible) Lord Chancellor (pictured above):

Lord Ch. No. It’s a nice point. I don’t know that I ever met it before. But my difficulty is that at present there’s no evidence before the Court that chorused Nature has interested herself in the matter.
Streph. No evidence! You have my word for it. I tell you that she bade me take my love.
Lord Ch. Ah! But, my good sir, you mustn’t tell us what she told you – it’s not evidence. Now an affidavit from a thunderstorm, or a few words on oath from a heavy shower, would meet with all the attention they deserve.
Streph. And have you the heart to apply the prosaic rules of evidence to a case which bubbles over with poetical emotion?
Lord Ch. Distinctly. I have always kept my duty strictly before my eyes, and it is to that fact that I owe my advancement to my present distinguished position.

Posted in Just for Fun | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Respect the family …

This month’s Journal website review is now available online.  It’s called “The Family Way” and manages to avoid any Mafia related jokes altogether (hmm … must try harder).

It includes reviews of the websites of the Scottish Family Business Association, the Caledonian Family Business Centre, Family Business Solutions, and the STEP Business Families Special Interest Group.

A small taster:

The Association even has a strategy for … lawyers [which] includes a commitment to ensuring that … all law degrees have compulsory modules on skills relating to advising family business.

Well, it’s good to set your goals high, I always say.

With thanks to Graham Murray of Wright, Johnstone & Mackenzie’s family business group, (you’ll find them just behind the magenta door) who suggested this month’s topic.

Posted in Commercial Law, Journal Website Reviews | Tagged | Leave a comment

Lions, and tigers, and bears – oh my!

tigerFurther forays into areas of the law in which I do not excel.  This week – personal injury law.  I start with the law relating to injuries caused by dogs and other animals.

The yell.com blog post can be found under its original title: The truth about cats and dogs.

Did you know that:

“Dangerous wild animals are defined in the Schedule to the Dangerous Wild Animals Act 1976 and include: monkeys, lemurs, kangaroos, porcupines, pandas, big cats, bears, elephants, rhinos, emus, alligators, many snakes, and some spiders and scorpions.”

Posted in Yell.com Solicitors Blog | Tagged , | Leave a comment