Absolvitor: Scots Law Online

In the same week as the European Court of Human Rights decided that the retention of DNA data by police forces in England & Wales was unlawful (Scotland already had legal limits on DNA retention) comes the disturbing news that the Scottish Children’s Reporter Administration has been disclosing personal details of vulnerable children (such as where and with whom they are now living) to … the very people the SCRA are supposed to be protecting the children from.

Exposing Scotland’s most vulnerable children to serious risk of violence, on at least 12 occasions in the past year, secret addresses of children taken from their parents and given new homes for their own safety were accidentally passed to their abusive or neglectful birth parents.

SCRA have admitted their mistake and issued an apology (for all the good that will do anyone). This sort of thing has happened once too often with government bodies for me to describe it as “unbelievable”, but this surely represents staggering new depths of incompetence?

The Scottish Government’s recent consultation paper “The Modern Scottish Jury in Criminal Trials” has raised an interesting dilemma for Kelvin Holdsworth, the Provost of St. Mary’s Episcopal Cathedral in Glasgow.

He asks (as does the consultation) “whether or not you think that clergy should have an automatic right to be exempt from jury service if they wish it. Currently the law in Scotland is that clergy can be called for jury service but they have the right (as do a small number of people in other roles) to opt out if they choose.”

The list of those who may opt out of jury service currently includes: members of the armed forces, MPs, MSPs, doctors, dentists, nurses, midwives, pharmacists and vets.

As Kelvin asks “As the court hears what you are accused of and you raise your eyes nervously towards the jury, do you want to see me, in a clerical collar perhaps, sitting there?” Well, do you?

Lauren Fowler, a partner in Ayrshire law firm Frazer Coogans Solicitors, has been accredited in both Child Law and Family Law by the Law Society of Scotland.

Lauren is the only solicitor in Ayrshire to be accredited in both fields.

The Cabinet Secretary for Justice has re-appointed existing Board members Sheriff Kenneth Ross, Elaine Rosie and Susan McPhee to the Scottish Legal Aid Board (SLAB). Their first terms of appointment ended on March 31, 2008.

Petition by Bill Alexander calling on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to reform the legal system to adopt the Scandinavian system of allowing unrestricted access to legal representation before the court for example by allowing non-lawyers to appear in court on behalf of other parties.

Campaign groups have expressed concern over the “limitations” of new legislation which aims to strengthen the law on rape.

The groups, including Rape Crisis Scotland, Scottish Women’s Aid and Victim Support Scotland, presented their worries about the Sexual Offences (Scotland) Bill to MSPs on the Scottish Parliament’s Justice Committee.

The MSPs heard that although the groups generally welcome the new legislation, they had a number of concerns that provisions in the bill could, in certain circumstances, make it more difficult to prove rape.

They also called for action to stop a complainer’s personal history being brought up in trials. Sandy Brindlay, national co-ordinator of Rape Crisis Scotland reported that medical records, including mental health problems and use of anti-depressants, are increasingly used in court by the defence counsel.

She said: “We need to be clear about its limitations. It doesn’t look at evidence at all. The particular area we are concerned about is sexual history and character evidence.”

Although the bill defines “consent” for the first time in law, Brindlay also highlighted concerns over “advance consent”. The bill indicates that, even if the complainer is subsequently unable to with withhold consent because they are asleep or under the influence of drink or drugs, there may still be consent if it was agreed at an earlier stage.

“You are to know, says he, that the Judges do not sit in court to do Business above three Hours in the day, that is from Eight in the Morning to Eleven. After they have taken some Refreshment, the Method is, to spend the rest of the Day in the Study of the Law, reading of the Holy Scriptures, or else it is taken up in some other innocent Amusements, at their Pleasure: So that it is rather a Life of Contemplation, than of Action, free from worldly Cares and Avocations.”

from De Laudibus Legum Angliae, by Fortescue (1470) – as quoted in “How to be free” by Tom Hodgkinson (2006).

The Welsh Rugby Union claimed a major legal victory on Friday in the ongoing dispute with the country’s professional clubs over player release for international games.

The four professional regional teams – Cardiff Blues, Ospreys, Newport Gwent Dragons and Scarlets – said players would not be released until five days before the first Test against South Africa, whereas head coach Warren Gatland wanted a further three days preparation.

On Friday, the High Court ruled that the regions should not “prevent, hinder or obstruct” the players from attending training on Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday of next week. Judge Havelock Allan’s decision is binding on the regions by virtue of the express terms of the Participation Agreement and their membership of the WRU.

WRU chief executive Roger Lewis is quoted as saying “Welsh rugby has right on its side and common sense has prevailed.”

As a result, Ospreys‘ winger Nikki Walker is set to join the Scottish Rugby training camp in Spain tomorrow – in preparation for autumn Tests against South Africa, New Zealand and Canada.